Barack Obama Calls For Reintroducing ‘Assault Weapons’ Ban In Second Presidential Debate

Almost on a weekly basis I read somewhere that Barack Obama and the Democrats will not pursue more gun “control” should the President be reelected.

President Obama’s supposed “inaction” during his first term is brought up as “evidence” of this.

Yet, as I pointed out back on September 6, the Democratic Party’s 2012 National Platform that was approved at their National Convention called for “reinstating the assault weapons ban and closing the gun show loophole.”

Excuse me, but that’s pushing for a gun ban and more gun “control,” if I’m not mistaken.

Any remaining doubts about President Obama and the Democrats wanting more regulations placed on firearms should have been dispelled last night in the second of a series of U.S. Presidential debates. When asked what his administration has “done or plan to do to limit the availability of assault weapons,” the sitting U.S. President replied:

So my belief is that A, we have to enforce the laws we’ve already got, make sure that we’re keeping guns out of the hands of criminals, those who are mentally ill. We’ve done a much better job in terms of background checks, but we’ve got more to do when it comes to enforcement.

But I also share your belief that weapons that were designed for soldiers in war theaters don’t belong on our streets. And so what I’m trying to do is to get a broader conversation about how do we reduce the violence generally. Part of it is seeing if we can get an assault weapons ban reintroduced, but part of it is also looking at other sources of the violence, because frankly, in my hometown of Chicago, there’s an awful lot of violence, and they’re not using AK-47s, they’re using cheap handguns.

(Editor’s note: Italics added for emphasis)

“Part of it is seeing if we can get an assault weapons ban reintroduced.”

Once again, calling for a new gun ban. Two times. Two months.

At this point, no one can honestly say Barack Obama and the Democrats don’t plan on pushing for more gun “control” should the President be reelected without looking incredibly stupid.

Share

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

3 Comments to Barack Obama Calls For Reintroducing ‘Assault Weapons’ Ban In Second Presidential Debate

  1. Could Obama use NDAA To Arrest Militias?

    Could Obama use NDAA To Arrest Militias on the Premise members are Militants and Belligerents that pose a threat to National Security?

    Recently the Obama administration stated to Federal Judge Katherine Forest that under (NDAA) The National Defense Authorization Act of 2012 the President had authorization to lock up belligerents indefinitely. That they (were justified) to lock belligerents up indefinitely—because cases involving belligerents directly-aligned with militants against the good of America—warrants such punishment.) Pres. Obama could use NDAA provisions to order U.S. Military Forces to round up without evidence, millions of Americans including militias by alleging they are belligerents or a threat to National Security. Many observers believe Obama intends to extend NDAA to imprison U.S. Citizens in Indefinite Detention not involved with or associated with enemy forces.

    Hitler included similar provisions in his fascist (Discriminatory Decrees signed February 28, 1933). Almost immediately after the German Parliament passed Hitler’s laws, the Reich Government ordered the arrest of German Citizens and confiscated their guns without probable cause or evidence; delegated powers to German Police and other authorities to arrest anyone Nazi authorities claimed attempted or incited public unrest: arrested among others were outspoken Germans, writers, journalists, peaceful protestors and artists. After World War II the East German Secret Police (Stasi) used the threat of Indefinite Detention to forcibly recruit thousands of informants.

    The U.S. 2012 NDAA legislation Obama signed 12-31-11 is similar to Hitler’s 1933 fascist laws the SS and Gestapo used to target persons in Germany for arrest, imprisonment and execution without probable cause; and confiscate millions of dollars of property. Hitler used his laws to suspend Parliament and the Supreme Court insuring his laws could not be rescinded.

    During the Obama Administration’s recent request for a (stay) to stop U.S. District Judge Katherine Forrest blocking enforcement of vague NDAA provisions, the Obama Administration—never clarified what constitutes a (belligerent); or militant; or what belligerent activities (directly aligned with a militant) to order a belligerent’s arrest or indefinite detention; or what is against the good of America. Under vague provisions of NDAA, the President could accuse anyone of being (directly aligned with militants by way of any political or other association; activity, statement, writing or communication with an individual or group government deemed (militant) to arrest and indefinitely detain Americans. Writers, journalists, Americans that disagree with or question U.S. Government or its allies—may under NDAA be subject to arrest and indefinite detention.

    NDAA 2012, like Hitler’s 1933 Discriminatory Decrees enforces censorship; refers to the Patriot Act e.g. warrant-less searches of private property and forfeiture of property from persons not charged with crime. Provisions in NDAA 2012 keep the door open for corrupt U.S. police; government agents and provocateurs which there are many, to falsify reports and statements to target any American, group or organization for arrest, indefinite detention, complete disappearance; civil asset forfeiture of their property.

    You may have noted NDAA referred to the USA Patriot Act. The Patriot Act lends itself to Government / police corruption; the Federal Government may use secret witnesses and informants to cause arrests and civil asset forfeiture of Americans’ property. Witness(s) and informants may be paid up to 50% of assets forfeited. Federal Government under 18USC may use a mere preponderance of civil evidence, little more than hearsay to Civilly Forfeit Private Property. Under the Patriot Act innocent property owners may be barred by government knowing the evidence federal government uses to forfeit their property.

    Sections of NDAA 2012 are so broad, it appears U.S. Government or the President could (retroactively) deem an American’s past 1st Amendment activities prior to passage of 2012 NDAA—supported hostilities, terrorism or (Belligerents) to order the arrest and Indefinite Detention of any U.S. Citizen, writer, group or organization.

    Under NDAA 2012 it should be expected that indefinitely detained U.S. Citizens not involved in terrorism or hostile activities, not given Miranda Warnings when interrogated, not allowed legal counsel or habeas corpus may be prosecuted for non-terrorist (ordinary crimes) because of their (alleged admissions) while held in Indefinite Detention.

  2. Rwolf on November 1st, 2012
  3. Sen. Dianne Feinstein announced that she will introduce an assault weapons ban on the first day of the new Congressional term. This show how far out of touch Dianne Feinstein is.
    1. Connecticut has an assault weapons ban
    2. None of the weapons used at the school in Connecticut were assault weapons.
    3. The school was in established gun to free his zone.
    I say to you get the Senate to pass a budget and bring this country back from financial ruin is far more important than a bill on assault weapons.

  4. Gordon Dill on December 16th, 2012
  5. Thanks for sharing that Gordon. Talked about the Senator’s proposed AWB- and Connecticut’s strict gun “control” laws- here.

  6. Editor on December 19th, 2012
Survival And Prosperity
Est. 2010, Chicagoland, USA
Christopher E. Hill, Editor

Happy MLK Day

Successor to Boom2Bust.com
"The Most Hated Blog On Wall Street"
(Memorial Day Weekend 2007-2010)

This Project Dedicated to St. Jude
Patron Saint of Desperate Situations



Please Rate this Blog HERE



happyToSurvive
Advertising Disclosure here. "Code Needed"=Promo Code Found On Advertiser Website. Ad Captions Last Updated 1/15/17.
ANY CHARACTER HERE
Buy Gold And Silver Coins Huge Silver Bar Sale (10 Oz. Individual & Monster Boxes)! World Gold (Bullion) Coins/Bars Also On Sale. Free Shipping On U.S. Orders $99 And Up (Only $5.95 Below $99!). BGASC Reviewed HERE.
ANY CHARACTER HERE
BullionVault World's Largest Online Investment Gold Service Taking Care Of $2 Billion For Over 65,000 Users From 175 Countries. BullionVault.com Reviewed HERE.
ANY CHARACTER HERE
1-Year Food Supply $1,597 + Free Shipping Limited Time Only; Alexapure Pro Water Filtration System $147; Big Savings On "Deal Of The Day" Page; Free Shipping On Orders Over $79. MyPatriotSupply.com Reviewed HERE.
ANY CHARACTER HERE
bullet proof vestsWorld's First Bulletproof Baseball Cap Only $129; Bulletproof Ceramic Plate (NIJ Level III Stand-Alone) Only $169; Bulletproof Backpack/Messenger Bag Panel Only $99. BulletSafe Reviewed HERE.
ANY CHARACTER HERE
Survival Titles Save 20% Discontinued Title Sale- Savings Up To 75% Off Original Price. Paladin Press Reviewed HERE.
 

Categories

Archives

Prepper Website

RSS Chris Hill’s Other Blog: Offshore Safe Deposit Boxes

  • Martin Armstrong: Old Gold Coins Better Than Bullion Against Confiscation
    In two January blog posts on his company’s website, economist Martin Armstrong shared what he thinks is the most effective way to possess and retain physical gold in the face of government confiscation. On January 10, Armstrong advised his blog readers: As we move forward, it will be best to hold assets out of banks […]
  • New Year’s Half-Price Domain Sale
    A little housekeeping to start off the blogging week on Offshore Safe Deposit Boxes. I’d like to direct your attention to the following on the blog’s sidebar: Opening An Offshore Private Vault? New Year’s HALF-PRICE Domain Sale Limited Time Only! elitevaults.com $100 offshoreprivatevault.com $500 offshoresafedepositbox.com $500 Inquire Via “Contact” Page Have a great week, Christopher […]
  • Related Reading: Singapore Private Vaults ‘Have Quietly Begun To Bulge With Gold And Silver’
    I recently came across an article on The Business Times (Singapore) website which points out privately-owned precious metals from around the world are finding their way to non-bank vaults in Singapore. Andrea Soh reported on December 12: These are unsettling times. A recession looms. Extremist parties are on the ascent globally. One of the oldest […]
  • Next Degussa Numis Day To Take Place January 26, 27
    Degussa, a leading international player in the precious metals world which also offers safe deposit boxes (for customers) at branches in Germany, Singapore, Spain, and Switzerland, has posted information about the next Numis Day (first blogged about here) at their Geneva and Zurich showrooms. From their website: The Next Numis Day We appreciate and appraise […]
  • Related Reading: Martin Armstrong Covered By Washington’s Blog
    Regular readers of Offshore Safe Deposit Boxes know I bring up economist Martin Armstrong from time to time (case in point, the last entry) due to his views on subjects such as the War on Cash, gold confiscation, and safe deposit boxes. This afternoon Armstrong was the focus of a post published my other blog- […]